<i>De novo EHMT2</i> variants cause an autosomal dominant <i>EHMT2</i> -related Kleefstra syndrome via loss of G9a methyltransferase activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract EHMT1 and EHMT2 genes encode human euchromatin histone lysine methyltransferase 1 and 2 (EHMT1 alias GLP; EHMT2 alias G9a) that form heteromeric GLP/G9a complexes with essential roles in epigenetic regulation of gene expression. While EHMT1 haploinsufficiency has been established as the cause of Kleefstra syndrome 1, the pathogenesis of G9a dysfunction in human disease remains largely unknown. We identified seven de novo EHMT2 variants in patients with clinical presentation, episignatures, histone modifications and transcriptomic profiles similar to those of Kleefstra syndrome 1. In vitro studies revealed that these variants encode for structurally stable G9a proteins that are catalytically incompetent due to aberrant interactions either with histone H3 tail or with S-adenosylmethionine. Heterozygous mice carrying a patient-derived variant exhibited growth retardation, facial/skull dysmorphia and aberrant behavior. Here we report pathogenic EHMT2 variants that likely exert dominant-negative effect on GLP/G9a complexes and thus genocopy the EHMT1 haploinsufficiency via a distinct molecular mechanism, defining an autosomal dominant EHMT2 -related Kleefstra syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".