CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are not the main driver of Lassa fever pathogenesis in macaques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Empirical data from survivors of Lassa fever and experimental disease modeling efforts, particularly those using mouse models, are at odds with respect to T cell-mediated pathogenesis. In mice, T cells have been shown to be imperative in disease progression and lethality, whereas in humans, an early and robust T cell response has been associated with survival. Here, we assessed the role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells on disease progression and severity of Lassa virus infection in a nonhuman primate model. Using an antibody-mediated T cell depletion strategy prior to and after inoculation, we were able to examine Lassa virus infection in the absence of specific T cell responses. In animals depleted for either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells, Lassa virus infection remained uniformly lethal, with only a slight delay in disease progression was observed in the CD4-depleted group when compared with nondepleted controls. Milder pulmonary pathology was noticed in the absence of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells. Overall, our findings suggest that T cells have a limited effect on the development of Lassa fever in nonhuman primates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".