Emergency physicians’ perspectives on integrating physiotherapists into emergency departments: a national survey from France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (EDs) worldwide are facing increasing patient volumes and thus crowding, prolonged waiting times and rising healthcare costs. In France, ED visits rose from 8.5 to 16 million between 2014 and 2024. To address these challenges, several countries (including Australia, the UK and Canada) have integrated physiotherapists into EDs in advanced practice roles-primarily for musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. In contrast, this type of integration is rare in the French healthcare system. The objective of the present study was to assess the attitudes of French emergency physicians to the incorporation of physiotherapists into ED teams. METHODS: A nationwide, cross-sectional survey of emergency physicians practising in France was conducted between 22 November 2023 and 15 February 2024. The study questionnaire assessed the physicians' willingness to collaborate with physiotherapists, the perceived benefits of collaboration and views on task delegation. Descriptive statistics and χ² tests were used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Of the 420 respondents, 333 (79.3%) expressed willingness to collaborate with physiotherapists in EDs. The most commonly cited benefits were improved quality of care n=321 (76.4%), greater patient satisfaction n=318 (75.7%), a lower physician workload n=276 (67.5%) and enhanced ED efficiency n=211 (50.2%). The conditions most frequently considered for delegation included suspected ankle sprains n=313 (74.5%), knee sprains n=277 (66.0%) and lower back pain n=271 (64.5%). Compared with junior colleagues, senior physicians with five or more years of experience were significantly more supportive of delegating cases of neck pain (n=110, 41.7%, p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: French emergency physicians are generally supportive of integrating physiotherapists into EDs, especially for the management of non-urgent MSK conditions. The physicians see physiotherapists as capable of providing on-site care and patient education, potentially improving patient flow and alleviating pressures in overcrowded EDs. These findings offer valuable insights for countries in which the integration of physiotherapy into emergency care is still emerging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.120 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".