MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414533055 · doi:10.2196/80213

Temporal Trajectories in Sleep, Temperature Trends, Cardiorespiratory, and Activity Metrics Measured via Oura Ring During Pregnancy: Large-Scale Observational Analysis

2025· article· en· W4414533055 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rebecca Adaimi, Nina Thigpen, Alicia Clausel, Massimiliano de Zambotti

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR mhealth and uhealth · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus (optics)Observational studyNormativeRing (chemistry)Dynamics (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy and childbirth involve significant health challenges, including preventable maternal deaths, severe complications, and disparities tied to social determinants, emphasizing the need for improved maternal care. Pregnancy could benefit from a more comprehensive, continuous care model that captures dynamic changes and enhances maternal-fetal outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This large-scale, real-world, high-density study aims to use wearable data to investigate maternal biobehavioral trajectories for pregnancies leading to loss, preterm, and term births, exploring how demographic factors like age and body mass index (BMI) affect these trajectories. METHODS: Retrospective observational analysis of pregnancies from a sample of 10,318 and 18- to 51-year-old female Oura Ring users (324 preterm births, 5039 term births, 4955 pregnancies ending in loss before 20 weeks of gestation). Oura biobehavioral data were analyzed across a 64-week window encompassing 8 weeks prepregnancy, through pregnancy, and post partum, via generalized estimating equation (GEE) statistical modeling. RESULTS: Gestational age emerged as a significant factor across all domains among term pregnancies (P<.001). During the first trimester, participants experienced marked sleep changes, peaking around week 9 and characterized by more time in bed (+30 min), asleep (+15 min), and awake (+15 min) compared with prepregnancy. Metrics declined and stabilized in the second trimester; by the third trimester, time in bed returned to baseline, while sleep remained reduced and wakefulness elevated. At birth, time in bed and wakefulness peaked, and sleep duration reached its minimum, with nighttime wake exceeding 3 SDs above baseline. Temperature changes were more pronounced, sustained, and occurred earlier than sleep changes-becoming evident by week 4, peaking at +0.3 °C above baseline by week 9, and showing a steady decline until birth. A secondary, modest increase (+0.1 °C) was observed near birth, followed by a decline postpartum. Heart rate (HR) increased steadily, peaking at +10 bpm above baseline at week 32, while HR variability declined by >15 milliseconds in a mirrored pattern. Respiratory rate peaked around week 9 and declined thereafter. Step count declined in the first trimester, with a ≈2000-step reduction at around week 8. After a slight rebound midpregnancy, activity declined again, reaching its lowest point near birth, with >2500 fewer steps than prepregnancy. Age and BMI showed significant but modest interaction effects (all P<.01). In pregnancies ending in loss, deviations emerged up to 2 weeks prior. Time in bed decreased starting ≈2 weeks before loss (P<.001), followed by reductions in sleep duration (P<.001), temperature trends (P<.001), respiratory rate (P=.019), HR (P=.005), and awake time (P=.033). CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the complex dynamics underlying changes in participants' sleep, temperature trends, cardiorespiratory, and activity data throughout pregnancy, involving extensive adaptations. A deeper focus on normative changes can advance maternal-fetal medicine, improve clinical outcomes, and address scientific gaps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR mhealth and uhealth→Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→