MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414537366 · doi:10.47392/irjaeh.2025.0550

Machine Learning Methods for Speech Emotion Recognition

2025· article· en· W4414537366 on OpenAlex
Sapna B Kulkarni

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Research Journal on Advanced Engineering Hub (IRJAEH) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsSemtech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkSupport vector machineRobustness (evolution)Feature extractionEmotion classificationMel-frequency cepstrumRandom forestGeneralizationFeature (linguistics)Benchmark (surveying)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural human-computer interaction requires the ability to identify human emotions from speech. Due to its many uses in virtual assistants, mental health evaluation, education, entertainment, and customer support systems, speech emotion recognition, or SE, has attracted a lot of attention lately. This study uses sophisticated feature extraction and classification techniques to investigate a machine learning-based method for speech emotion classification. In this work, we use acoustic features like spectral contrast, chroma, and Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) to extract emotional cues from speech signals. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machines (SVM) are among the classifiers that are trained and assessed using these features. It makes use of the Ryerson Audio-Visual Database of Emotional Speech and Song (RAVDESS) serves as the training and testing benchmark dataset. According to experimental results, deep learning models—particularly CNN and CNN-LSTM hybrids—perform better than conventional machine learning techniques. Combining temporal and spectral features effectively captures emotional nuances in speech, as evidenced by the CNN model's 84.2% accuracy and the CNN-LSTM model's peak accuracy of 86.7%. The suggested model's robustness and capacity for generalization are validated by a thorough analysis employing confusion matrices and precision-recall metrics. Understanding user emotions can greatly improve the quality of interactions in real-world applications, and this research offers a solid basis for integrating SER systems. Future research will focus on handling noisy environments, enhancing cross-linguistic performance, and enabling real-time deployment of embedded systems. This study also emphasizes how crucial it is to choose the ideal feature combination to accurately depict emotional content. The addition of Chroma and Spectral Contrast improves the model's capacity to identify subtle emotional inflections, especially in similar-sounding classes like "calm" vs. "happy" or "angry" vs. "fearful," even though MFCCs provide a condensed and popular representation of the speech spectrum. To increase recognition accuracy across a variety of speaker profiles, feature fusion is essential. This study also contrasts shallow and deep learning classifiers to highlight their advantages and disadvantages. Traditional classifiers, such as SVM and Random Forest, perform poorly when working with raw or complex features, despite being computationally light and efficient for small-scale systems. On the other hand, automatic feature learning and temporal modeling help the CNN and CNN-LSTM architectures capture complex prosody, rhythm, and tone patterns linked to emotional expressions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it