MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414538698 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2025.3608857

Multiscale-Hashing Network for 6-D Pose Estimation of Unseen Objects in the Wild

2025· article· en· W4414538698 on OpenAlexaff
Jiaming Zhou, Qing Zhu, Yaonan Wang, Mingtao Feng, Xuebing Liu, Faisal Shafait, Ajmal Mian

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersAustralian Research CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaAustralian Government
KeywordsPoseTask (project management)Object (grammar)Hash functionObject detectionScale (ratio)3D pose estimationLocalityLocality-sensitive hashing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estimating the pose of unseen objects is a fundamental task in robotics and industrial automation. Some methods rely on prior knowledge of individual objects for this task and require the model to be trained on specific object instances or categories. Other methods can estimate the pose of unseen objects but are often limited in handling occlusions. To address these challenges, we propose an unseen object pose estimation method for objects not encountered during training. We propose a Hashing Attention Network that integrates features from multiple scales to effectively capture global information while maintaining high sensitivity to local positional details, thereby significantly enhancing the model’s predictive accuracy for occluded objects. We incorporate Locality Sensitive Hashing into the self-attention mechanism of the vision transformer. This approach significantly reduces computational complexity by computing attention for tokens at each scale based on hash similarity, both within the same scale and across multiple scales. The network was trained on selected BOP datasets, and the Linemod, T-LESS, and Wild6D datasets were used to evaluate pose estimation on unseen objects. Our results show that the proposed model outperforms existing methods across various quantitative metrics, making it well suited for industrial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ASME Transactions on MechatronicsSame topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207