Performance-Complexity Tradeoff for ISAC Transceiver Design: A Deep Unfolding Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) can boost the spectrum efficiency and facilitate the diverse emerging applications via sharing the same spectrum and hardware between communication and sensing. However, it may suffer from high complexity. In this paper, we develop a low-complexity deep unfolding learning aided transceiver design for ISAC. Particularly, the weighted sum of multi-user interference power and the reciprocal of sensing signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio is minimized subject to the constraints of constant modulus signal and waveform similarity by transceiver design. An alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM)-based iterative algorithm is first developed to solve this non-convex optimization problem. To reduce the complexity, we propose a deep unfolding neural network (NN), which can unfold the underlying ADMMbased iterative algorithm to a lightweight NN with some learnable parameters and circumvent the bisection method using the projected gradient descent. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed deep unfolding NN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".