MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Contribution of biosphere reserves to global biodiversity conservation and climate change

2025· article· en· W4414543121 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhiyun Ouyang, Jun Tang, Weihua Xu, Xiao‐Song Li, Li Zhu, Lei Cao, Mingli Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo Kexueyuan yuankan · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiosphereThreatened speciesBiodiversityClimate changeGlobal biodiversityEndangered speciesDeforestation (computer science)Global warming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biosphere Reserves are areas recognized by UNESCO that represent key terrestrial, coastal, and marine ecosystems. These areas are strictly protected and designed to fulfill three primary functions: conserving biodiversity, promoting sustainable development, and supporting scientific research and education. As of now, 759 biosphere reserves have been established in 136 countries and regions worldwide, supporting the livelihoods of approximately 236 million people. The total area of biosphere reserves covers 7.67 million km<sup>2</sup>, accounting for 4.10% of global terrestrial area, 5.08% of freshwater surface, and 0.21% of marine areas. The reserves encompass diverse ecosystems, including 2.22 million km<sup>2</sup> of forests, 2.24 million km² of grasslands, 0.34 million km<sup>2</sup> of wetlands, 0.64 million km<sup>2</sup> of deserts, and 1.17 million km<sup>2</sup> of aquatic systems. According to species occurrence records from the GBIF database (2010-2024), global biosphere reserves harbor 96 147 plant species (representing 45.10% of all plant species recorded in the database) and 17 603 vertebrate species (covering 56.39% of the global total). Notably, these include 3 351 threatened plant species (29.88%) and 2 551 threatened vertebrate species (36.78%). Global biosphere reserves collectively function as a substantial carbon sink, with an estimated total capacity of 1.35×10<sup>15</sup> g C and an average annual sequestration rate of 205.02 g C/m<sup>2</sup>·yr. These reserves thus play a dual vital role in maintaining global biodiversity and mitigating climate change impacts. However, biosphere reserves face several challenges, including the under-representation of globally threatened plant species, loss of natural ecosystems, and gaps in biodiversity data. Moving forward, it is essential to enhance the role of biosphere reserves in biodiversity protection, promote green development pathways, and strengthen their contributions to local socioeconomic development. Biosphere reserves should serve as pioneering zones and demonstration areas for implementing the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals, making meaningful contributions to global biodiversity conservation and sustainable development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhongguo Kexueyuan yuankanSame topicEcology, Conservation, and Geographical StudiesFrench-language works237,207