MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414544441 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.200815

Towards an Advanced Economy Through Batik SMEs: The Strategic Role of Green Innovation and Knowledge Management in Local Competitiveness

2025· article· en· W4414544441 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ana Komari

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKnowledge economyGreen innovationInnovation managementGreen economyStrategic managementStrategic planning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores the potential of the East Java Bakorwil II batik industry, a creative cultural sector hindered by weak branding, low design innovation, and minimal adoption of environmentally friendly practices.The research aims to design a model highlighting the role of green innovation as a mediating factor in strengthening the competitive advantage of local batik products.Using quantitative Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 154 batik industry players participated in the study, with ethical clearance obtained.The results indicate that green innovation significantly mediates the relationship between knowledge management and competitive advantage (O = 0.282; T = 4.482; p = 0.000), and brand image and competitive advantage (O = 0.239; T = 4.648; p = 0.000).The study also finds significant direct effects of knowledge management on green innovation (O = 0.507; T = 8.338; p = 0.000), brand image on green innovation (O = 0.431; T = 7.078; p = 0.000), and green innovation on competitive advantage (O = 0.555; T = 5.723; p = 0.000).However, the direct effect of brand image on competitive advantage was not significant (p = 0.088).This study contributes to the understanding of how integrating green innovation and knowledge management can enhance the competitiveness of batik MSMEs, offering practical implications for strengthening their market position through sustainable strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicEducational Methods and Media UseFrench-language works237,207