MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414545110 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-16219-7

Temporal convolutional transformer for EEG based motor imagery decoding

2025· article· en· W4414545110 on OpenAlexafffund
Hamdi Altaheri, Fakhri Karray, Amir-Hossein Karimi

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsVector InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMotor imageryConvolutional neural networkEncoderElectroencephalographyDecoding methodsTransformerFeature extraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) based on motor imagery (MI) offer a transformative pathway for rehabilitation, communication, and control by translating imagined movements into actionable commands. However, accurately decoding motor imagery from electroencephalography (EEG) signals remains a significant challenge in BCI research. In this paper, we propose TCFormer, a temporal convolutional Transformer designed to improve the performance of EEG-based motor imagery decoding. TCFormer integrates a multi-kernel convolutional neural network (MK-CNN) for spatial-temporal feature extraction with a Transformer encoder enhanced by grouped query attention to capture global contextual dependencies. A temporal convolutional network (TCN) head follows, utilizing dilated causal convolutions to enable the model to learn long-range temporal patterns and generate final class predictions. The architecture is evaluated on three benchmark motor imagery and motor execution EEG datasets: BCIC IV-2a, BCIC IV-2b, and HGD, achieving average accuracies of 84.79, 87.71, and 96.27%, respectively, outperforming current methods. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the integrated design in addressing the inherent complexity of EEG signals. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/altaheri/TCFormer .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.509

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207