MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414548305 · doi:10.1097/qad.0000000000004261

Off target effects of HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitors in cell and animal models: a scoping review

2025· article· en· W4414548305 on OpenAlexaff
Marie-Soleil R. Smith, Renying Cai, Hélène C. F. Côté

Bibliographic record

VenueAIDS · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsB.C. Women's Hospital & Health CentreWomen's Health Research InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegraseAdverse effectLentivirusHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)In vivoCellIn vitroIntegrase inhibitorClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the past decade, integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-containing regimens have become the most widely used HIV treatment worldwide. Despite their high efficacy and tolerability, numerous adverse effects have been reported, including weight gain, neuropsychiatric effects, and reproductive health concerns. These reports were the impetus for an array of postapproval in vitro and in vivo studies. This scoping review consolidates and discusses all research conducted post-INSTI approval, from 2007 to 2024, that focused on the effects of INSTI exposure in cell and animal models. It provides insights into potential effects and mechanistic details that may not be revealed through clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIDSSame topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentFrench-language works237,207