Social cognition and connectedness in adult refugees: the case of Syrians living in Türkiye
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Millions of people around the world have been forced to migrate due to various factors such as wars, political and ethnic conflicts, and economic instability. Refugees face numerous post-migration challenges such as problems of adaptation to their new country, language barriers, acculturation stress, and ethnicity concerns. These issues, along with other challenges, make it difficult for refugees to build social connections in their new host country. Social connectedness and social cognition among refugees are areas that have not been thoroughly studied. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate social cognition and social connectedness in adult refugees who had to migrate due to the civil war that started in Syria in 2011 and settle in Türkiye. METHOD: A total of 499 individuals, including 249 Syrian refugees and 250 Turks as the control group, were included in the study. Participants completed a variety of assessments, including a sociodemographic data form, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), Social Connectedness Scale (SCS), and Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET). RESULTS: The comparison analyses revealed that Turkish participants had higher scores in both social cognition and social connectedness compared with Syrian refugees. The refugees had statistically significantly higher alexithymia and childhood trauma scores than Turkish participants. The MANCOVA analysis indicated that childhood trauma was significantly associated with both social cognition and social connectedness. In addition, depression and alexithymia were significantly associated with social connectedness. The interaction effect of factors on social cognition such as exposure to war, receiving financial support from the state, and financial loss was found to be significant. Other dyadic and triadic interactions had no significant effects on social connectedness. CONCLUSION: Refugees' social cognition performance and social connectedness levels were found to be lower than in Turkish participants. Refugees' poor social cognition and connectedness may be related to childhood traumas. It may not be a consequence of being a refugee. In this period when refugees face significant challenges, our study offers promising findings that could enhance their integration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".