MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414554774 · doi:10.1186/s10195-025-00874-7

Soft tissue reconstruction of tumor-related proximal tibial hemiarthroplasty using synthetic mesh combined with a medial gastrocnemius flap

2025· article· en· W4414554774 on OpenAlex
Zhuoyu Li, Jing Zhao, Daoyang Fan, Zhiping Deng, Yongkun Yang, Xiaohui Niu, Qing Zhang, Weifeng Liu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKey Technologies Research and Development ProgramBeijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding SupportNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSoft tissueOrthopedic surgerySports medicineRheumatologyTibiaPlastic surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: This study was to evaluate the efficacy of soft tissue reconstruction using synthetic mesh and a medial gastrocnemius flap in patients who underwent proximal tibial hemiarthroplasty after resection of proximal tibial bone sarcomas. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 102 skeletally immature children (58 males, 44 females) who underwent proximal tibial Hemiarthroplasty between January 2005 and December 2023. The most common diagnoses were osteosarcoma (95%), Ewing's sarcoma (4%), and chondrosarcoma (1%). The mean age was 11 years (7-14 years) and the mean follow-up was 85 months (12-233 months). We reported complications according to the modified Henderson classification. The functional outcomes were evaluated by Musculoskeletal Tumour Society Score (MSTS-93) and the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS). RESULTS: Patients in the combined reconstruction group had higher MSTS-93 and TESS scores (MSTS-93, 83% versus 72%, p = 0.023; TESS, 85% versus 74%, p = 0.041). The mean 2-year postoperative Insall-Salvati ratio (ISR), the Blackburne-Peel index (BPI), and the Caton-Deschamps index (CDI) for patients who underwent combined reconstruction were 1.18 ± 0.32, 0.98 ± 0.22, and 1.21 ± 0.28, respectively. While, The mean 2-year postoperative ISR, BPI, and CDI of patients without combined reconstruction were 1.42 ± 0.39, 1.25 ± 0.29, and 1.61 ± 0.41, respectively (p < 0.05). The combined reconstruction group had a lower mean extensor lag (4.3° versus 11.3°, p < 0.001). In total, 33 patients had at least one complication and 27 patients underwent surgical revision, including 13 infections, 8 local recurrences, 3 soft tissue failures, 2 aseptic loosening, and 1 implant failure. The combined reconstruction group had a lower rate of knee dislocation (2.7% versus 21.4%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Soft tissue reconstruction of the proximal tibia using synthetic mesh combined with a medial gastrocnemius flap improves the postoperative efficacy of tumor-related proximal hemiarthroplasty and is expected to reduce the incidence of postoperative knee dislocation and periprosthetic infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III case control study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it