MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414555587 · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2025.09.016

Phase II INTEGRIS-PSC trial of bexotegrast, an αvβ6/αvβ1 integrin inhibitor, in primary sclerosing cholangitis

2025· article· en· W4414555587 on OpenAlexaff
Gideon M. Hirschfield, Kris V. Kowdley, Palak Trivedi, Bertus Eksteen, Bilal Hameed, Catherine Vincent, Tianyan Chen, Aparna Goel, K. Gautham Reddy, Eric S. Orman, Deepak Joshi, Éric Lefebvre, Johanna Schaub, Mahru C. An, Annie Clark, Chris N. Barnes, Richard Pencek, Douglas Thorburn, Aldo J. Montaño‐Loza, Christoph Schramm, Christopher L. Bowlus, Michael Trauner, Cynthia Levy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hepatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University Health CentreToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary sclerosing cholangitisIntegrinPhase (matter)Primary (astronomy)Biliary tract

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background & Aims Transforming growth factor-β signaling activated by α v β 6 and α v β 1 integrins drives liver fibrosis in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and exploratory pharmacodynamics of bexotegrast (PLN-74809), an oral, once-daily inhibitor of α v β 6 and α v β 1 integrins, in participants with PSC and liver fibrosis. Methods In this phase II, double-blind, dose-ranging study, 117 participants with PSC were randomized 3:1 to receive once-daily oral bexotegrast or placebo in three cohorts: 40 mg or placebo for 12 weeks (part 1); 80 mg, 160 mg, or placebo for 12 weeks (part 2); and 320 mg or placebo for up to 40 weeks (part 3). The primary endpoint was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Exploratory pharmacodynamic endpoints included changes in alkaline phosphatase values, enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) scores, neoepitope-specific N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen (PRO-C3) levels, liver stiffness measurements, gadoxetate-enhanced MRI measures, and the Itch Numeric Rating Scale. Results A total of 117 participants received bexotegrast (40 mg [n = 22], 80 mg [n = 21], 160 mg [n = 21], 320 mg [n = 27]) or placebo (n = 30). Bexotegrast was well tolerated, with similar rates of TEAEs in the pooled bexotegrast and placebo groups (72.7% and 70.0%). TEAEs were mild to moderate, and no serious TEAEs related to study drug were observed. Numerically less pharmacodynamic progression was observed with bexotegrast in ELF score, PRO-C3, and MRI assessments at Week 12 compared with placebo. Pharmacodynamic results at Week 24 showed limited change from Week 12 except in MRI parameters which continued to improve. Conclusions Bexotegrast was well tolerated for up to 40 weeks in participants with PSC and liver fibrosis and was associated with numerically less progression in exploratory pharmacodynamic markers. Impact and implications Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare cholestatic disease of unknown etiology. Currently, there is an unmet medical need for safe and effective therapies capable of halting or reversing progression of PSC. In this phase II study in participants with PSC and suspected liver fibrosis, bexotegrast, an oral, once-daily, dual selective inhibitor of α v β 6 and α v β 1 integrins, had a favorable safety and tolerability profile. This study supports targeting integrin-mediated transforming growth factor-β activation as a potential therapeutic approach for PSC. Trial registration number NCT04480840.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HepatologySame topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207