MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414561489 · doi:10.1007/s00249-025-01799-z

Proceedings of the 26th International Analytical Ultracentrifugation Workshop and Symposium

2025· editorial· en· W4414561489 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Johannes C. Walter, Alexander Bepperling

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Biophysics Journal · 2025
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
KeywordsAnalytical UltracentrifugationChinaIsothermal titration calorimetryCzechNeutron scattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 26th International Analytical Ultracentrifugation Workshop and Symposium (AUC2024) took place at the scenic Banz Abbey near Bad Staffelstein, Germany, from July 22 to 27, 2024. 84 participants from 16 countries (Belgium 1, Canada 7, China 3, Colombia 1, Czech Republic 3, Finland 1, France 3, Germany 35, Israel 1, Italy 1, Japan 2, New Zealand 2, Spain 1, Switzerland 4, United Kingdom 5, United States 14) travelled to Germany to present and discuss the latest advances in the field. 40 workshop sessions were held by world-leading experts covering all aspects of AUC including experimental design, data analysis and data processing according to good manufacturing practice (GMP), but also complementary methods such as hydrodynamic modelling, isothermal titration calorimetry and small angle X-ray scattering data processing were considered. A visit to a stalactite cave in Franconian Switzerland and the Bavarian beer museum in Kulmbach offered a welcome change to the scientific program and started off the 3-day symposium. The presentations featured of course AUC, but also dynamic and static light scattering, small angle X-ray and neutron scattering, surface plasmon resonance, field flow fractionation, calorimetry, chromatography, and electron microscopy. The AUC2024 special volume provides a comprehensive overview of the sustained innovation, utility and relevance of AUC and related solution biophysical and particle technology methods across various disciplines, including biochemistry, structural biology, synthetic polymer chemistry, carbohydrate chemistry, protein and nucleic acid characterization, nano and colloids science, and macromolecular interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Biophysics JournalSame topicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsFrench-language works237,207