Attention-Fusion-Based Two-Stream Vision Transformer for Heart Sound Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vision Transformers (ViTs), inspired by their success in natural language processing, have recently gained attention for heart sound classification (HSC). However, most of the existing studies on HSC rely on single-stream architectures, overlooking the advantages of multi-resolution features. While multi-stream architectures employing early or late fusion strategies have been proposed, they often fall short of effectively capturing cross-modal feature interactions. Additionally, conventional fusion methods, such as concatenation, averaging, or max pooling, frequently result in information loss. To address these limitations, this paper presents a novel attention fusion-based two-stream Vision Transformer (AFTViT) architecture for HSC that leverages two-dimensional mel-cepstral domain features. The proposed method employs a ViT-based encoder to capture long-range dependencies and diverse contextual information at multiple scales. A novel attention block is then used to integrate cross-context features at the feature level, enhancing the overall feature representation. Experiments conducted on the PhysioNet2016 and PhysioNet2022 datasets demonstrate that the AFTViT outperforms state-of-the-art CNN-based methods in terms of accuracy. These results highlight the potential of the AFTViT framework for early diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases, offering a valuable tool for cardiologists and researchers in developing advanced HSC techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".