MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414564383 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101592

Perinatal outcomes and uptake of RSV vaccine during pregnancy in South London: a cross-sectional study

2025· article· en· W4414564383 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad S Razai, Erkan Kalafat, Smriti Prasad, Chelone Lee-Wo, Paul T. Heath, Asma Khalil

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersDepartment of Health and Social CareNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsPregnancyDisadvantagedVaccinationEthnic groupSocioeconomic statusEpidemiologyPublic healthGestation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Maternal respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination has been introduced to protect infants from severe respiratory infections. However, its uptake and impact on perinatal outcomes are unknown in the UK. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate uptake of RSV vaccine during pregnancy in a UK population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary maternity hospital in London. The participants included pregnant women who delivered between 1 September and 17 December 2024 (n=1157). For the analysis of vaccine uptake, the cohort included women eligible for vaccination who delivered beyond 28 weeks' gestation and were at 36 weeks or less on 1 September 2024 (n=911). The main outcome measures were RSV vaccine uptake and its association with sociodemographic factors, perinatal outcomes including preterm birth (PTB), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and stillbirth. RESULTS: Of 911 eligible women, 19% (n=173) received the RSV vaccine during pregnancy. Uptake increased significantly from 4% in September to 32% in December (p<0.001). Vaccinated women were older (median age 35 vs 32 years, p<0.001), more likely to be white (66.3% vs 46.5%, p<0.001), and from higher socioeconomic quintiles (Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile 5: 18.5% vs 11.2%, p=0.029). Smoking during pregnancy was less common in vaccinated women (0.6% vs 5.0%, p=0.016). Multivariable logistic regression identified older maternal age (p=0.001), higher socioeconomic status (IMD quintile 1 vs 5; adjusted OR (aOR) 0.28, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.81, p=0.030) and ethnicity (Asian: aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.88, p=0.015, black: aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.95, p=0.040, mixed: aOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.39, p=0.004) as independent predictors of vaccine uptake. PTB rates at <37 weeks were comparable between groups (9.6% vs 10.0%, p=0.980), but no vaccinated women experienced PTB<34 weeks compared with 3.2% of unvaccinated women (p=0.032). Caesarean section rates were higher among vaccinated women (52.0% vs 35.5%, p<0.001). No significant differences were observed in other perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: RSV vaccine uptake shows significant increases over time, with disparities in uptake by ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Further research is needed to increase vaccination rates, particularly in disadvantaged groups, and evaluate perinatal outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ OpenSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207