MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414568196 · doi:10.1016/j.geodrs.2025.e01015

Quantifying CO2 emissions from Quebec's agricultural peatland and identifying key parameters for guiding soil conservation strategies

2025· article· en· W4414568196 on OpenAlex
F. L’Heureux-Bilodeau, Jacynthe Dessureault‐Rompré, Alain N. Rousseau, Jean‐François Caron

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoderma Regional · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSoil waterPeatSoil carbonArable landSoil organic matterGreenhouse gasEdaphicOrganic matterTotal organic carbon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Quebec, Canada, field vegetable production largely occurs on cultivated organic soils of Montérégie. These soils become arable following extensive drainage of peatlands, which are highly fertile but vulnerable to subsidence, erosion, and organic matter mineralization. The latter causes carbon losses to the atmosphere through CO₂ emissions and can also lead to dissolved organic carbon leaching. This study quantified CO₂ emissions and identified governing edaphic and meteorological parameters to support the development of carbon compensation strategies for peatland managers. Easily measurable soil parameters were selected to provide farmers with potential proxies for routine soil analysis. Five commercial sites were selected based on their organic matter (OM) content: F1 (52.2 %), F2 (56.7 %), F3 (74.0 %), F4 (77.4 %), and F5 (91.3 %). All sites, except F3, were devoid of vegetation. Soil CO₂ emissions were measured using manual static chambers over one year (September 2021–September 2022) at bimonthly intervals. Gross annual carbon losses were 4.94 Mg C-CO₂ ha −1 yr −1 for F1, 5.47 for F2, 15.30 for F3, 7.62 for F4, and 3.20 for F5. Soil temperature, total microbiological activity (fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis), total nitrogen, and pH significantly and positively influenced CO₂ fluxes, while soil water content showed a negative correlation. Annual carbon losses were highly and exponentially correlated with total microbiological activity, underscoring its relevance as a biological indicator and promising proxy for CO₂ emissions. This study advances understanding of CO₂ emissions from cultivated organic soils and highlights the importance of targeted strategies to mitigate carbon losses and conserve these valuable peatland resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.163
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it