MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414569762 · doi:10.1002/marc.202500587

Multifunctional Mussel‐Inspired Hydrogels and Films Formed via Catechol‐VO <sub>2</sub> Nanoparticle Coordination

2025· article· en· W4414569762 on OpenAlexafffund
Mostafa Rammal, Matthew J. Harrington

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Rapid Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsSelf-healing hydrogelsThermochromismNanoparticlePolymerFabricationCoatingPolyethylene glycol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Marine mussels utilize DOPA‐V metal coordination bonds as dynamic cross‐links to fabricate tough and self‐healing coatings and glues. Inspired by mussels, researchers have harnessed DOPA‐metal coordination to create dynamic and mechanically responsive polymeric materials. Here, we harness the robust DOPA‐V interactions observed in mussels combined with the temperature‐responsive properties of vanadium dioxide (VO 2 ) to develop a room‐temperature process to produce thermochromic VO 2 hydrogels and films. 4‐arm polyethylene glycol (PEG) polymers functionalized with DOPA‐catechol moieties were mixed with VO 2 nanoparticles in solution. Raising pH led to formation of hydrogels, while spin coating enabled processing into thin films. Hydrogels possessed mechanically tunable viscoelasticity and self‐healing response. Furthermore, dried free‐standing films were highly flexible and exhibited plastic deformation with extensibilities of 200% and beyond, while still retaining the thermochromic properties of the nanoparticles. The facile fabrication method and the resulting versatile mechanical response combined with thermochromic properties are promising for future development VO 2 ‐polymer composite materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular Rapid CommunicationsSame topicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryFrench-language works237,207