MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414572132 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103531

Exploring the temporal relationship between stigma, disease manifestations, and health outcomes in post COVID-19 condition: a longitudinal descriptive study

2025· article· en· W4414572132 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ronald W. Damant, Liam Rourke, Grace Y. Lam, Maeve P. Smith, Jason Weatherald, Cheryl R. Laratta, Desi P. Fuhr, Ying Cui, Michael K. Stickland, Giovanni Ferrara

Bibliographic record

VenueEClinicalMedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSanofi
KeywordsDescriptive researchDiseaseLongitudinal studyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Descriptive statisticsMEDLINEHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Stigma is defined as a deeply discrediting attribute. Post COVID-19 Condition (PCC) is now recognized to be a source of health-related stigma and discrimination capable of negatively impacting the well-being of those affected. Our purpose was to explore the relationship between PCC-related stigma, disease manifestations, and health outcomes over time. Methods: Using previously validated instruments to measure PCC-related stigma, symptoms, depression, quality of life, function, and occupational status, we conducted a longitudinal descriptive study in a cohort of individuals with confirmed PCC between May 12 and August 13, 2023 in the Canadian city of Edmonton. Findings: Ninety-nine consenting participants completed study questionnaires 3-24 months following an initial diagnosis of PCC (enrollment) and again a mean (SD) of 1.6 (0.26) years later (follow-up). Individuals experienced marked variability in study scores over time. Measures of central tendency proved inadequate to detect changes within the cohort. There was minimal attenuation of stigma scores between enrollment and follow-up despite a "return to normal" from earlier pandemic responses: the change in mean stigma score from enrollment to follow-up was -0.2 (p = 0.97). Significant correlations were found between enrollment stigma and symptoms, depression, function, and quality of life measured at follow-up (r = 0.45-0.55). Similar correlations were noted between enrollment stigma and follow-up composite disease manifestation, health outcome, and global well-being scores (r = 0.39-0.54). Multivariate multiple regression demonstrated statistically significant associations between the change in stigma from enrollment to follow-up and symptoms, depression, functional status, and quality of life (B = -0.45 to -0.11). When participants were categorized as "improved stigma at enrollment" vs. "unchanged or worse stigma at enrollment", changes in stigma over time appeared to be predictive of disease manifestations and health outcomes at follow-up (Cohen's d = 0.43-0.77). Interpretation: This study provides insights into the temporal relationship between PCC-related stigma, disease manifestations, and health outcomes and could establish a foundation for screening, prognostication, treatment, and other efforts to mitigate the impact of stigma. Funding: The Long COVID Web is funded by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR)-Grant #185352.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.542
GPT teacher head0.561
Teacher spread0.019 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEClinicalMedicineSame topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207