MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414588687 · doi:10.1007/s00296-025-05968-3

Scoping review of biosimilar disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in pregnancy: evidence gaps and proposed outcome reporting framework

2025· article· en· W4414588687 on OpenAlexafffund
Vienna Cheng, Neda Amiri, Vicki Cheng, Ursula Ellis, Jacquelyn J. Cragg, Laurie Proulx, Dwayne Tucker, Mary A. De Vera

Bibliographic record

VenueRheumatology International · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsCanadian Patient Safety InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesCanadian Arthritis Patient AllianceArthritis Research Centre of CanadaCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesResearch Canada
FundersArthritis Society
KeywordsBiosimilarAntirheumatic drugsAntirheumatic AgentsRheumatoid arthritisPharmacoepidemiologyPregnancyMEDLINECohortCohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have revolutionized the management of autoimmune diseases. Biosimilar DMARDs have emerged as highly similar, cost-efficient alternatives; however, the scope of their perinatal evidence remains unexplored. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize evidence on the impact of biosimilar DMARDs on pregnancy outcomes. We searched Embase, MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases in November 2023 and June 2025. Inclusion criteria were studies examining biosimilar DMARD exposure for autoimmune diseases in mothers during pregnancy, fathers prior to conception and/or fetuses/neonates in-utero. Data were extracted on sample size, study design, drug exposure (timing, duration), and pregnancy outcomes. Patterns in methodologic reporting across studies were also analyzed. Overall, 6 studies (5 descriptive, 1 cohort study) were eligible for inclusion. Biosimilars examined were tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (infliximab, n = 4; etanercept, n = 2; adalimumab, n = 1) and B-cell inhibitors (rituximab, n = 1) among 63 mothers with inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis. Twenty-four fetal/neonatal (i.e., congenital anomaly), fetal/neonatal-maternal (i.e., Caesarean-section, spontaneous abortion), and maternal (i.e., disease flare) outcomes were reported. For methodologic reporting, we observed inconsistencies in exposure and outcome measures. To enhance comparability and standardization, we encourage the use of our Reproductive Health Outcomes Reporting Framework. Our scoping review is the first synthesis of perinatal evidence to date on biosimilar DMARDs. Critical gaps include an overall limited number of studies and a lack of analytical research that evaluate associations between exposures and outcomes. These findings highlight key evidence gaps in understanding the perinatal impacts of these emerging drugs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.301
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.583
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.301
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.3010.583
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.013
Bibliometrics0.0530.049
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0150.012
Open science0.0100.010
Research integrity0.0090.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRheumatology InternationalSame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207