MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414590461 · doi:10.1108/jec-03-2025-0071

Addressing the challenges of youth migration on entrepreneurial intention: a conceptual focus on Nigeria

2025· article· en· W4414590461 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel E. Ufua, Adamu G. Kasa, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al‐Faryan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global Economy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEconomic Growth and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser Valley
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtant taxonConceptual frameworkStakeholderThe Conceptual FrameworkConceptual modelFocus group

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose This study aims to address Nigerian youth migration challenges to their desires to achieve entrepreneurial success in other countries rather than in Nigeria. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts a conceptual approach, relying on the extant literature to explore the topic. Systems and the Brain-drain theories were adopted to explore the connectivity, structure and broad functioning of identified elements toward attain the set purpose of this study. Findings This study identified irregular migration as the most common among Nigerian youths. This study developed a suggested model, identifying factors to address the challenges of youth migration in Nigeria and emancipate their entrepreneurial intentions. These included awareness campaigns, financial support, legal system support, institutional and stakeholder involvement and the embrace of flexibility. Originality/value This study concluded that for an effective synchronization of youth migration and entrepreneurial intentions, the relevant stakeholders identified in this study must play their parts, thereby creating a formidable system that will aid Nigerian youths in achieving entrepreneurial goals without necessarily migrating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Enterprising Communities People and Places in the Global EconomySame topicEconomic Growth and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207