MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414592870 · doi:10.3390/s25195995

Agentic Search Engine for Real-Time Internet of Things Data

2025· article· en· W4414592870 on OpenAlexaffabout
Abdelrahman Elewah, Khalid Elgazzar, Said Elnaffar

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Agent-Based Network Management
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataInteroperabilitySoftware deploymentInternet of ThingsWeb of ThingsOntologyData discoveryProcess (computing)The Internet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Internet of Things (IoT) has enabled a vast network of devices to communicate over the Internet. However, the fragmentation of IoT systems continues to hinder seamless data sharing and coordinated management across platforms.However, there is currently no actual search engine for IoT data. Existing IoT search engines are considered device discovery tools, providing only metadata about devices rather than enabling access to IoT application data. While efforts such as IoTCrawler have striven to support IoT application data, they have largely failed due to the fragmentation of IoT systems and the heterogeneity of IoT data.To address this, we recently introduced SensorsConnect-a unified framework designed to facilitate interoperable content and sensor data sharing among collaborative IoT systems, inspired by how the World Wide Web (WWW) enabled shared and accessible information spaces for humans. This paper presents the IoT Agentic Search Engine (IoTASE), a real-time semantic search engine tailored specifically for IoT environments. IoTASE leverages LLMs and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques to address the challenges of navigating and searching vast, heterogeneous streams of real-time IoT data. This approach enables the system to process complex natural language queries and return accurate, contextually relevant results in real time. To evaluate its effectiveness, we implemented a hypothetical deployment in the Toronto region, simulating a realistic urban environment using a dataset composed of 500 services and over 37,000 IoT-like data entries. Our evaluation shows that IoT-ASE achieved 92% accuracy in retrieving intent-aligned services and consistently generated concise, relevant, and preference-aware responses, outperforming generalized outputs produced by systems such as Gemini. These results underscore the potential of IoT-ASE to make real-time IoT data both accessible and actionable, supporting intelligent decision-making across diverse application domains.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicMobile Agent-Based Network ManagementFrench-language works237,207