MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414593475 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2025-0013

Cretaceous strike–slip displacement along the Porcupine fault system and potential links to the opening of the Canada Basin

2025· article· en· W4414593475 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Karol Faehnrich, William C. McClelland, Laura E. Webb, E. Troy Rasbury, Maurice Colpron, Justin V. Strauss

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsYukon University
FundersNational Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program
KeywordsFault (geology)TerraneCretaceousFault scarpDevonianArcticTectonicsSinistral and dextralStructural basinDeformation (meteorology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tectonic models for the evolution of the Canada Basin of the Arctic Ocean posit Jurassic–Cretaceous counterclockwise rotation of the Arctic Alaska terrane away from the Canadian Arctic Islands, translation along a strike–slip fault system, or some hybrid combination of the two. Here, we present evidence for post-Devonian deformation within the Porcupine fault system of northern Yukon and Alaska, which forms the southeastern boundary of the Arctic Alaska terrane. Neoproterozoic–Cretaceous strata exposed within the fault zone record polyphase deformation related to strike–slip displacement. Muscovite 40 Ar/ 39 Ar data from two samples collected north of the Porcupine River produced plateau or plateau-like segments at ca. 342–367 Ma and younger steps at ca. 105 Ma, consistent with initial cooling after emplacement of the Upper Devonian Old Crow plutonic suite and later Cretaceous–Cenozoic partial resetting. In contrast, samples from within the main strand of the fault system yield complex spectra with single steps as old as ca. 1779 Ma, highlighting contrasting thermal histories across it and post-Late Devonian truncation of the Old Crow plutonic suite. The timing of Mesozoic deformation is better constrained by U/Pb dating of calcite veins within the fault system, which yield an age of ca. 121 Ma. Coupled with field observations of unambiguous strike–slip related deformation within the Porcupine fault system, these geochronological data are consistent with translational or hybrid models for the opening of the Canada Basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences→Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→