MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414594592 · doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000000798

High biochemical remission rates in patients with primary biliary cholangitis treated with “triple” anticholestatic therapy

2025· article· en· W4414594592 on OpenAlexaffabout
Guilherme Grossi Lopes Cançado, Bo Chen, Madeline Cameron, Inbal Houri, Kristel Leung, Aliya Gulamhusein, Bettina E. Hansen, Gideon M. Hirschfield

Bibliographic record

VenueHepatology Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalQueen's UniversityUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComplete remissionUrsodeoxycholic acidNormalization (sociology)Aspartate AminotransferasesPrimary biliary cirrhosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Treatment goals in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) are increasingly aspirational, aiming for normal serum liver tests. One of the add-on therapies to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is with the approved farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist obeticholic acid (OCA), alongside off-label use of fibrates (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor [PPARs]). We report our experience of synergistic FXR-PPAR-UDCA combination therapy in PBC. METHODS: A review of patients with PBC seen between July 2022 and July 2023 was performed across the autoimmune liver disease programme at the Toronto Centre for Liver Disease. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy patients with PBC were seen, of which 71% were treated with UDCA only, 7% UDCA-OCA, 11.3% UDCA-fibrates, and 10.6% UDCA-OCA-fibrates. Among 50 patients on triple therapy, 82% had OCA as the first add-on therapy. Most patients (92%) received bezafibrate, while 8% had fenofibrate. Forty-eight patients were included in the final analysis. The mean follow-up time after triple therapy was 17.4 months. Triple therapy demonstrated median ALP reductions after 6 months of 33.3% (95% CI: 27.9%-37.6%) and 39.1% (95% CI: 30.7%-46.2%) at the last follow up; 30.2% of the patients had a normal serum ALP at 6 months, while 11.9% had normal ALP, AST, ALT, and bilirubin. Subgroup analysis of 28 patients followed for at least 12 months showed a 44.7% (95% CI: 33.3%-50.9%) median reduction in ALP. Liver stiffness remained relatively stable throughout the follow-up. Out of 34 patients with self-reported pruritus before triple therapy, 64.7% reported improvement, 11.8% worsened, and 23.5% had no change in itching intensity. On multivariable analysis, only older age at diagnosis (OR=1.12; 95% CI: 1.02-1.22) positively impacted ALP normalization. CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm that FXR-PPAR-UDCA triple therapy significantly improves ALP with normalization for 30% of patients with PBC at 6 months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHepatology CommunicationsSame topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207