MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414599041 · doi:10.2503/hrj.24.221

Effects of Mechanized Harvesting on Harvest Efficiency and Storage Quality in Japanese Chestnut

2025· article· en· W4414599041 on OpenAlexaff
Takumi Arakawa, T. Yamaguchi, Natsumi Ogata, Shinji Kamio, Iwao Terakado

Bibliographic record

VenueHorticultural Research (Japan) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant and Fungal Interactions Research
Canadian institutionsIron Ore Company (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuality (philosophy)MechanizationHarvest time

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

クリ収穫作業における2種の自走式収穫機,1種のトラクターマウント式収穫機の省力性を特徴づけた.国産自走式収穫機のクリ果の収穫率はトルコ製収穫機H130よりも優れており,走行速度の影響を受ける可能性が示唆された.作業効率を評価したところ,機械収穫は機種によらず作業時の落果密度(一定の面積に落下したきゅう果や果実の数)が高いほど収穫効率が優れる一方で,慣行法である火ばさみを用いた手作業で収穫する方法は落果密度によらず一定の効率であることが示唆された.きゅう果の収穫およびいが剥きを機械化した場合,慣行法と比べて最大約4倍効率的であり,国産収穫機といが剥き機の組み合わせが最も優れることが示唆された.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHorticultural Research (Japan)Same topicPlant and Fungal Interactions ResearchFrench-language works237,207