MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414603167 · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2025.3615417

Muscle Synergy Analysis of Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain During Functional Tasks

2025· article· en· W4414603167 on OpenAlexaff
Guohao Lin, Xiong Zhao, Ben Cao, Jintian Chen, Qingguang Zhu, Lingjun Kong, Min Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTrunkElectromyographyLow back painEccentricMotor controlMotor unit recruitmentMotor coordinationChronic pain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic low back pain (LBP) significantly impairs daily functional movements. Persistent pain may trigger alterations in neuromuscular control, particularly muscle coordination. However, muscle synergy patterns during specific functional tasks in patients with LBP remain unclear. We recruited 36 participants, including 18 patients with chronic LBP (the LBP group) and 18 healthy participants (the control group). Surface electromyography signals were recorded from ten trunk and lower-limb muscles during three common functional tasks: sit-to-stand, trunk flexion, and lifting. Muscle synergies were extracted via non-negative matrix factorization. Cosine similarity analysis and statistical parametric mapping were applied to evaluate spatial (motor modules) and temporal (motor primitives) differences between groups. Compared to the control group, participants with chronic LBP exhibited a reduced number of muscle synergies during sit-to-stand, indicating adaptive reorganization of motor modules. Although spatial muscle synergy structures were largely conserved between groups, significant temporal differences emerged in trunk flexion, particularly during eccentric phases. Patients with LBP showed prolonged and temporally shifted activation of spinal extensors and hip-pelvic stabilizers, suggesting compensatory mechanisms to mitigate spinal loading. Muscle contribution patterns during lifting tasks also differed significantly between groups, despite similar temporal activation. In conclusion, patients with chronic LBP demonstrate distinct muscle synergy adaptations characterized by reduced complexity, altered timing during eccentric trunk movements, and modified lower-limb recruitment strategies. Trunk flexion emerged as a particularly sensitive task for identifying neuromuscular deficits in LBP. These findings provide targeted insights for clinical rehabilitation, emphasizing eccentric trunk control, motor control timing, and lower-limb muscle retraining.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207