Long-Stay Psychiatric Inpatients With and Without Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: An Ontario Population-Based Study: Patients hospitalisés pour de longs séjours en psychiatrie avec ou sans déficiences intellectuelles et développementales,: Une étude fondée sur la population de l’Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ObjectivePatients with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) and psychiatric disorders are at higher risk for prolonged hospitalisations. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of IDD among long-stay inpatients in Ontario psychiatric beds, and compare the demographic and clinical profiles of long-stay inpatients with and without IDD.MethodsThis Ontario population-based cross-sectional study used linked health administrative databases. All patients over 18 years of age occupying a non-forensic psychiatric inpatient bed in Ontario on September 30th, 2023 were included in the analysis. We examined prevalence of IDD among patients with a length of stay (LOS) ≥ 365 days ('long-stay patients'). Standardised differences were used to compare demographic, clinical, functional, and health care utilisation characteristics between patients with and without IDD.ResultsOf the 1,466 long-stay patients in an Ontario non-forensic psychiatric inpatient bed, 22.0% had IDD. They were younger (mean age 44.3 vs. 47.6) and a higher proportion were male (64.3% vs. 50.1%). In the 2 years prior to admission, a higher proportion of long-stay patients with IDD had a psychotic disorder (73.3% vs. 54.0%), and they had a higher median number of ED visits (5 vs. 3). Long-stay inpatients with IDD were more likely to have difficulty with activities of daily living (39.8% vs. 15.0%), moderate/severe cognitive impairment (63.0% vs. 29.9%) and fewer social contacts in place to support discharge (59.3% vs. 48.6%). While in hospital, a greater proportion of long-stay patients with IDD were subject to restraints (12.4% vs. 8.0%) and seclusion (20.2% vs. 11.2%).ConclusionsAdults with IDD account for more than one in five long-stay psychiatric inpatients and have unique needs including greater cognitive impairment and difficulty caring for themselves. Successful transitions out of hospital require specialised resources and cross-sectoral collaboration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".