ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT AS A MEDIATOR IN MANAGERIAL PERFORMANCE OF REGIONAL APPARATUS IN PAPUA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the mediating role of organizational commitment in the relationship between budget participation, leadership style, motivation, job satisfaction, and managerial performance in the regional government apparatus (OPDs) of Merauke, South Papua. As one of Indonesia's newly autonomous provinces, South Papua faces significant administrative challenges, especially in implementing decentralization policies and managing special autonomy funds effectively. This research employs a quantitative explanatory design with data collected from 386OPD employees through structured questionnaires and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS 4.0. The findings reveal that budget participation, motivation, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment have significant direct effects on managerial performance. In contrast, leadership style does not directly influence performance. Motivation, while negatively affecting performance directly, contributes positively to organizational commitment, which subsequently enhances performance. Organizational commitment also plays a significant mediating role in the relationship between budget participation, motivation, and job satisfaction with managerial performance. However, it does not significantly mediate the effect of leadership style on performance.This study is grounded in Organizational Behavior Theory, Path-Goal Theory, Expectancy Theory, and Contingency Theory, offering a robust theoretical lens to understand how internal organizational dynamics affect public sector performance. The results underscore the importance of participatory leadership, strategic human resource management, and job satisfaction in fostering emotional attachment and performance-enhancing behaviors among civil servants.Theoretically, the research enriches public administration literature; practically, it informs policymakers and administrators seeking to optimize human capital in underdeveloped regions with unique cultural and political contexts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".