MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Analysis of a single population first recognized as disabled due to hand and wrist injuries

2025· article· en· W4414614123 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu. I. Osipov, K. M. Khamko, O. A. Voronets

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth and Ecology Issues · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWristPopulationRehabilitationAmputationDisability pensionQuarter (Canadian coin)Hand injuryUpper limb

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective. To study the main characteristics of a single population first recognized as disabled due to hand and wrist injuries. Materials and methods . An unselected sampling of the patient population was formed, which included 747 people aged over 18 years old who underwent initial examination in the medical and rehabilitation expert commission of the Republic of Belarus for the period of 2014-2023, and were recognized as disabled due to physical dysfunction caused by the consequences of hand and wrist injuries. Materials of the database of the Republican Information and Analytical System on Medical Assessment and Rehabilitation of Disabled Persons of the Republic of Belarus were used. Results . The average annual rate of primary disability due to hand and wrist injuries average for the period of 2014- 2023 in the Republic of Belarus was 0.10 (95% DI: 0.09-0.11) per 10,000 population, the proportion of men in the structure of primary disability was 83.5 %, the average age of persons first recognized as disabled was 46.4±12.1 years old. Among the persons first recognized as disabled, 82.7% were employed in working professions, urban residents prevailed over rural residents by 1.9 times. Crushing and traumatic amputation at the level of the wrist and hand, leading to disability, prevailed in 18-49 year olds and urban residents, accounting for 38.9%. Among rural residents, nerve injuries at the level of the wrist and hand were the predominant disabling injuries in 37.0% of cases. In 29.2% of cases of primary disability due to injuries of the hand and wrist, the cause of disability was determined as “labour injury”, of which in 34.5% of cases, the degree of loss of professional working capacity was determined as 60% due to loss of fitness for a skilled occupation. Conclusion. The main characteristics of the contingent, first recognized as disabled due to hand and wrist injuries, are of working age, male gender, employment in working specialties, a significant proportion of persons who received industrial trauma, the prevalence of severe injuries in the form of traumatic amputations of the hand and wrist, a high percentage of loss of professional ability to work, which, taking into account the crucial role of the hand in human production activity, indicates the central direction of rehabilitation of this population — elimination of restrictions to work through professional rehabilitation measures, creation of an inclusive environment for obtaining the opportunity to carry out work activities, as well as improving preventive measures of this type of injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth and Ecology IssuesSame topicTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207