MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Epidemiology and risk factors of seizures in dogs: Insights into breed, age, gender and management practices

2025· article· en· W4414617399 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jyotika, Lathamani VS, PT Ramesh, GP Kalmath, B.P. Shivashankar, H.C. Indresh

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuteringEpidemiologyEtiologyBreedDewormingEpilepsyJuvenile

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seizures are a common neurological emergency in dogs, arising from diverse etiologies including idiopathic, structural, metabolic, infectious and toxic causes. This study evaluated 126 dogs with seizures to investigate breed predisposition, age of onset, gender, neutering status, preventive care, source of adoption and dietary factors. Non-descript dogs (20.6%) were most frequently affected, followed by Golden Retrievers (12.7%) and Labrador Retrievers (11.1%). Seizures were most commonly observed between 6 months and 6 years of age (57.9%), predominantly idiopathic/structural in origin, while organ dysfunction and infectious causes were more common in geriatric and juvenile dogs, respectively. A higher proportion of affected dogs were male (60.3%) and intact (64.3%). Preventive care was suboptimal, with irregular or absent vaccination and deworming noted in a majority of dogs. Dogs acquired from breeders/kennels (34.1%) exhibited higher seizure incidence, likely reflecting genetic predispositions and dietary patterns indicated increased risk in dogs fed non-vegetarian diets (46.0%). These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of seizures in dogs, highlighting the influence of breed, age, sex, preventive care, adoption source and diet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Animal HusbandrySame topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyFrench-language works237,207