MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414618390 · doi:10.3389/fvets.2025.1676779

Efficacy of a 20:1 CBD:THC cannabis herbal extract for pain and inflammation in dogs following tibial plateau leveling osteotomy

2025· article· en· W4414618390 on OpenAlexaff
Chloe Lyons, K. Romany Pinto, Kira Penney, Jane Alcorn, Alan Chicoine

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Veterinary Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalgesicCannabisInflammationAdverse effectOsteotomyOral administrationPlateau (mathematics)Antipyretic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: This study investigates the efficacy of 20:1 cannabidiol:tetrahydrocannabinol (CBD:THC) cannabis herbal extract (CHE) in reducing pain and improving mobility in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) for cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLr). Methods: Forty-eight dogs were enrolled in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial at the Western College of Veterinary Medicine between December 2022 and October 2024. Dogs were assigned to one of the three treatment groups: placebo (flavored olive oil), 2 mg CBD (0.1 mg THC)/kg body weight (bw), or 5 mg CBD (0.25 mg THC)/kg bw. All dogs received a standard peri- and post-operative analgesic protocol consisting of opioids, nerve blocks, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and gabapentin. Veterinary assessments were performed on days +1 and +14 postoperatively and included Glasgow Composite Pain Scores (GCPS), stifle range of motion (ROM), thigh and stifle circumference, and gait symmetry ratios. Owners were advised to complete a modified Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) on days +3, +7, and +14. Plasma cannabinoid concentrations on days 1 and 14 were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Data were analyzed using linear mixed models and generalized estimating equations. Results: Forty-two dogs completed the study. All dogs had marked improvement in owner-reported pain scores from days +1 to +14, regardless of treatment group. There were no significant differences in outcome measures between treatment groups. Potential treatment × day interactions were noted for ROM and gait symmetry; the high CHE dose group had marginally greater function on day +1, but none of these effects persisted to day +14. No serious adverse events were reported; mild gastrointestinal effects (vomiting or diarrhea) were noted in seven cases. Owners reported the CHE doses were generally well tolerated. Plasma cannabinoid concentrations were highly variable and did not correlate with clinical outcomes. Clinical significance: Overall, administration of an oral 20:1 CBD: THC cannabis herbal extract in addition to a standard analgesic protocol did not improve analgesia and limb function following TPLO surgery in dogs. Minor functional benefits may have occurred in the higher CHE dose group, but only on the first day following surgery. Current multimodal peri- and post-operative analgesic practices were effective, irrespective of CHE administration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Veterinary ScienceSame topicVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyFrench-language works237,207