Exploring Foundations for Developing a Learning Model to Promote Stress Self-Awareness Among Thai Grade 12th Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the foundational information and specific needs for developing a learning model that promotes stress self-awareness among Grade 12th students. Grounded in the framework of Contemplative Education, the research integrates both theoretical and practical perspectives to guide its design. Data were collected through a comprehensive review of academic literature, including printed and online sources, along with surveys and focus group discussions. These methods were employed to generate deep, contextually relevant insights into the experiences and needs of students at this critical developmental stage. Survey results revealed that nearly 67% of students lacked consistent mindfulness practice—36.57% had never practiced and 30.10% only occasionally—suggesting limited exposure to strategies that support self-regulation. Despite this, students demonstrated a moderate to high level of stress awareness (M = 3.58), indicating that they are conscious of stress symptoms but may lack tools to manage them effectively. The high perceived need for stress-awareness learning (M = 4.33) highlights a clear demand for structured, supportive interventions to bridge the gap between awareness and actionable coping skills. Focus Group Discussions include key strategies identified include reflective practices, mindfulness training, and experiential learning within a psychologically safe environment. Furthermore, this article synthesizes relevant theories, concepts, and empirical research to establish a robust foundation for developing a learning approach that nurtures students’ emotional, psychological, and life skills. It aims to respond effectively to the unique challenges and needs faced by Grade 12th students as they prepare for transitions beyond secondary education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".