Revisiting the evolution of the yeast Atg1 complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Atg1 complex coordinates the initiation of nonselective autophagy and consists of the Atg1 kinase, Atg13 regulatory subunit, and an S-shaped scaffold formed by Atg17, Atg29, and Atg31. In contrast, the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Atg1 complex incorporates Atg101 instead of Atg29 and Atg31 and features a rod-shaped Atg17 scaffold. The timing of this divergence and its impact on the structural evolution of Atg17 remain unclear. Our systematic composition analysis revealed that Atg101 is found in the Atg1 complex of several budding yeast species, including two that contain both Atg29/Atg31 and Atg101. Structural modeling and negative stain EM analysis indicated that budding yeast species with Atg101 exhibit a rod-shaped Atg17. Additionally, we found that the Atg13 HORMA domain of S. pombe may possess a stabilizing cap, suggesting an alternative function for Atg101. Collectively, our findings delineate the potential evolutionary trajectories of the Atg1 complex in yeast.Abbreviations: ATG, autophagy-related; BLAST, basic local alignment search tool; C-Mad2, closed Mad2; EAT, Early Autophagy Targeting/Tethering; EM, electron microscopy; His-MBP, histidine-maltose binding protein; HORMA, Hop1, Rev7, and Mad2; IDR, intrinsically disordered region; O-Mad2, open Mad2; iTOL, Interactive Tree of Life; PAS, phagophore assembly site; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; pTM, predicted template modeling; RMSD, root mean square deviation; TOR, target of rapamycin; TORC1, TOR complex 1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".