MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4414623976 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.9431

Poster Session 7: Oncology – Bladder, Renal, Testes (Part 2)

2025· article· en· W4414623976 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Editor CUAJ

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSession (web analytics)MEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Patients (pts) with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR NMIBC) have a high risk of disease progression and limited treatment (tx) options.TAR-200 is an intravesical drug-releasing system designed to provide sustained delivery of gemcitabinein the bladder.SunRISe-1 (NCT04640623) is an ongoing phase 2b study assessing TAR-200 in pts with BCG-unresponsive HR NMIBC, ineligible for/refused radical cystectomy.Cohorts 1-3 enrolled pts with carcinoma in situ (CIS) ± papillary disease.We report one-year duration of response (DOR) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in pts receiving TAR-200 monotherapy (cohort 2).Methods: Pts (≥18 y; ECOG PS 0-2) had histologically confirmed CIS ± papillary disease (high-grade Ta, any T1) with last dose of adequate BCG ≤12 months of CIS diagnosis.TAR-200 was dosed Q3W to W24 then Q12W to W96.No re-induction for non-responders was allowed.Primary Endpoint was overall complete response (CR) rate.Secondary endpoints were DOR, overall survival, PROs, and safety.Response assessments included cystoscopy, centrally assessed urine cytology (Q12W), centrally assessed biopsy (W24/48), and local imaging (Q24W).Change from baseline in global health status (GHS) and physical functioning (PF) scores (0 [worse]-100 [better]) on EORTC-QLQ-C30, completed at W0, 6, 12, Q12W on tx, and at safety follow-up, was assessed.Results: On the September 4, 2024 data cutoff, 85 pts (median age, 71 y [range 40-88]; 80% male; 33% with concurrent papillary disease) received tx, wth a median followup 14 mo (range 2-41).Centrally confirmed and investigator-assessed CR rates were both 84% (95% CI 74-91).Estimated 12-month CR rate was 50% (95% CI 36-62).Estimated median DOR and one-year DOR rate were 26 months (95% CI 9-NE) and 55% (95% CI 40-68), respectively.Nine pts completed two years of tx; seven remain in response.Mean GHS (75 [SD 16.7]) and PF (86 [SD 17.3]) scores were high at baseline and stable on tx (did not exceed clinically meaningful change threshold of ≥10 points); 71 pts (84%) had tx-related adverse events (TRAEs); most were low-grade lower urinary tract AEs.Ten pts (12%) had grade ≥3 TRAEs; five (6%) had serious TRAEs; three (4%) had TRAEs leading to tx discontinuation.No tx-related deaths occurred.Conclusions: TAR-200 monotherapy was well-tolerated, with the highest CR rate reported in BCG-unresponsive HR NMIBC.Responses were highly durable, and most responders were disease-free at one year.Clinical benefit of TAR-200 was achieved with sustained overall health status and high PF.Data will be updated after final results in April.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3480.169

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association Journal→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→