MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414623999 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.9427

Poster Session 2: Basic Science and Pediatrics

2025· article· en· W4414623999 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Editor CUAJ

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluoroscopySession (web analytics)Confidence intervalRadiation exposureRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Retrograde urethrogram (RUG) is the standard imaging method used to evaluate the urethral stricture.The ALARA principle ("as low as reasonably achievable") emphasizes minimizing radiation exposure through strategies such as time management, distance optimization, and shielding.This study explored the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of pulsed fluoroscopy RUG (1FPS) compared to traditional RUG (4FPS) in identifying urethral strictures. Methods:The study is a prospective RCT conducted at TBRHSC institute as of September 2022 and is still ongoing; it includes a total of 45 participants.RAND function in Excel assigned 21 patients to the traditional RUG arm and 24 to pulsed fluoroscopy RUG.The demographic data, dose, and duration were obtained, as were stricture location during RUG and intraoperative procedure.Results: A total of 77 RUG procedures were performed from September 2022 to the present.The median age of patients was 68 years (range 39-88).Of these, seven patients were found to have no strictures, confirmed through cystoscopy.Another 25 patients were excluded due to the presence of complex stricture disease or the need for procedural manipulation.The preliminary results showed that average X-ray exposure time during RUG for the pulsed fluoroscopy RUG group (n=25), set at one frame per second (FPS), was 0.76 seconds, while it was 0.98 seconds for t h e traditional RUG group (n=21).The average radiation dose for the traditional RUG was 0.00411 µGy, compared to 0.00373 µGy for the pulsed RUG group.Data analysis conducted using IBM SPSS (v30.0) and Excel, yielded an F-statistic of 1.24, which was compared to the critical F-value (24,21) of 2.05 at a 95% confidence interval (α=0.005).This result indicated no significant difference in radiation doses between the two groups (p=0.30).RUG results were compared with intraoperative findings, with results showing specificity of 100% and an accuracy of 100%.Urethral strictures were categorized as bulbar urethral strictures (66.66%) and penile urethral strictures (33.33%).Conclusions: Pulsed retrograde urethrography (RUG) demonstrates exceptional diagnostic accuracy (100%) while significantly reducing X-ray exposure time (ALARA principle).Although the observed reduction in radiation dose did not reach statistical significance -potentially due to the judicious use of the X-ray paddle by the physician and the variability in patients' BMI -these findings nonetheless highlight the potential of pulsed RUG to enhance patient safety.Further studies and data are warranted to establish the feasibility of pulsed RUG as an innovative and safer diagnostic modality for the evaluation of urethral stricture in male patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4170.200

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicPharmaceutical studies and practicesFrench-language works237,207