An Anatomical Study of At-Risk Nerves During Carpal Tunnel Release: Considerations for the Prevention of Iatrogenic Nerve Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Despite carpal tunnel release (CTR) being a common procedure in hand surgery, variation in the location of the nerves supplying the palm leads to a high risk of iatrogenic damage. Recommendations have been made for a surgical incision placement that would avoid such damage, yet injury persists in clinical practice. These studies infrequently consider the safety of multiple at-risk nerves when making their recommendation, often optimizing the safety of one and subsequently jeopardizing another's. Methods: Sixty-one dissections were performed on formalin preserved cadavers to define a safe zone in the palm and recommend an incision placement for CTR. Detailed measurements examining the anatomy of the palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (PCBMN), the palmar cutaneous branch of the ulnar nerve (PCBUN), and the thenar motor branch (TMB) were taken relative the scaphoid tubercle, pisiform, or the A line. Results: The PCBMN was located 3.3 ± 4.1 mm ulnar to the scaphoid tubercle and 8.7 ± 3.9 mm radial to the A line. The PCBUN was located the 6.5 ± 2.4 mm radial and 6.6 ± 3.7 mm ulnar from the pisiform and A line respectively. The TMB was found 8.0 ± 3.3 mm from the A line and was classified as 56% extraligamentous, 31% subligamentous, and 13% transligamentous. Conclusion: We conclude that an area approximately 6 mm ulnar and 7 mm radial from the A line is the safe zone for CTR and recommend an incision placement in line with the radial aspect of the fourth digit. This knowledge may aid surgeons performing CTR and help reduce iatrogenic damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".