MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414651880 · doi:10.3390/foods14193399

Foliar-Selenium-Induced Modulation of Volatile Organic Compounds in Rice Grains: A Comparative Study of Sodium Selenite and Nano-Selenium

2025· article· en· W4414651880 on OpenAlexaff
Yin Xiong, Yingying Hu, Ruomeng Li, Yulin Wu, Xuhong Tian, Yibo Chen, Jingbo Zhou, Lei Zhao, Chongrong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueFoods · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSelenium in Biological Systems
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSeleniumAromaSowingSodiumPaddy fieldDegradation (telecommunications)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rice aroma is influenced by many factors, including selenium (Se) fertilizer. In this study, we investigated the effects of different Se species on the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in three indica rice varieties over 2022 and 2023 by forliar spray. The VOCs were analyzed using HS-SPME-GC-MS. The results showed that both Se nanoparticles (SeNPs) and sodium selenite (Na2SeO3) significantly increased the contents of most VOCs in all three varieties, with SeNPs exhibiting a more pronounced effect. PCA and OPLS-DA revealed distinct clustering of the VOCs based on Se treatments and rice varieties. By variable importance in projection (VIP) analysis with FDR correction, Na2SeO3 yielded 7 markers, whereas SeNP treatment identified 18. Every marker detected under Na2SeO3 was fully encompassed within the SeNPs set. Three-factor ANOVA indicated that there are significant interaction effects among Se species, rice variety, and planting year. Additionally, the effect sizes were evaluated in the key VOCs to quantify the effect of Se species, rice variety, and planting year. The findings highlight Se fertilizers to enhance rice aroma and suggest selecting appropriate Se species and rice varieties for aroma improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFoodsSame topicSelenium in Biological SystemsFrench-language works237,207