Generative and integrative modeling for transcriptomics with formalin fixed paraffin embedded material
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples suffer from the degradation of nucleic acids, a problem that becomes particularly acute with samples stored for extended periods. It remains challenging to profile FFPE using high-throughput sequencing technologies including RNA-sequencing, and the resulting FFPE RNA-seq (fRNA-seq) data has a high rate of transcript dropout, a property shared with single cell RNA-seq. Transcript counts also have high variance and are prone to extreme values, together making downstream analyses extremely challenging. METHODS: We introduce the PaRaffin Embedded Formalin-FixEd Cleaning Tool (PREFFECT), a probabilistic framework for the analysis of fRNA-seq data. PREFFECT uses generative models to fit distributions to observed expression counts while adjusting for technical and biological variables. The framework can exploit multiple expression profiles generated from matched tissues for a single sample (e.g., a tumor and morphologically normal tissue) in order to stabilize profiles and impute missing counts. PREFFECT can also leverage sample-sample adjacency networks that assist graph attention mechanisms to identify the most informative correlations in the data. RESULTS: We evaluated the distribution of transcript counts across a compendium of fRNA-seq datasets, finding the negative binomial distribution best fits the data with little evidence supporting zero-inflated extensions. We use this knowledge in the design of PREFFECT. We show that PREFFECT can accurately impute missing values from fRNAseq count matrices and adjust for batch effects. The inclusion of sample-sample adjacency networks and multiple tissues were shown to enhance sample clustering. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of studies to date contain at most a few hundred profiles, making it challenging to correctly infer good statistical fits for each transcript especially in complex cohorts, given the noisy, incomplete and heterogeneous nature of the data. The integrative and generative approach of PREFFECT provides better and more specific model fits than generic bulk RNA-seq tools, especially when more advanced PREFFECT models provide matched profiles are included in the analysis. The transformed data can be directly used with many well-established tools for downstream analysis tasks, empowering its use in clinical biomarker studies and diagnostics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".