MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414675660 · doi:10.21535/2hgj0953

Editorial Note: The Launching of the Journal of Instrumentation, Automation and Systems (JIAS)

2014· article· en· W4414675660 on OpenAlexaff
Youmin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Instrumentation Automation and Systems · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSemantic Web and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomationWork (physics)Process automation systemInformation system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Launching of the Journal of Instrumentation, Automation and Systems (JIAS) Although the discipline of Instrumentation, Automation and Systems has been the subject of active research and development in the past many decades, Instrumentation, Automation and Systems play more and more important role and become necessary and part of our modern life.Such instrumentation, automation and systems can be as small as smart phones, laptop computers, embedded systems used in our daily life, and as large as cars, airplanes, trains, ships, and unmanned air, space, ground, on-and under-water vehicles etc.To make all these systems working properly for their different design purposes, we cannot imagine this will be possible without the advances in instrumentation, automation and systems.Smart actuators, smart sensors, and smart instruments make the automation level and overall systems performance better and safer.Every day, we can see the new developments in instrumentation, automation and systems.How can we reflect these new developments in a timely and professional way?All these facts make the birth of this new journal: The Journal of Instrumentation, Automation and Systems (JIAS), thanks to the sponsorship of the International Society on Intelligent Unmanned Systems and the UNSYSdigital.The objective and scope of The Journal of Instrumentation, Automation and Systems (JIAS) are to publish qualified papers timely and regularly on the relevant areas including, but are not limited to: Sensors/Actuators/Instruments, Controllers: Hardware, software, and systems, Radar and signal processing, Internet and multimedia systems, Information technology, Fieldbus technology and interfaces, Mechatronics systems and applications, Intelligent systems, Control and instrumentation, Signal and image processing, Machine vision, Robotics, Automation, Manufacturing mechatronics, Smart materials and structures and applications, MEMS and NEMS, Autonomous/Unmanned systems, Real-time systems, Distributed control and remote monitoring, System integration, Fault detection and diagnosis (FDD), Fault tolerant control (FTC), Virtual instrumentation and control, Engineering applications of Instrumentation, Automation and Systems.In this first issue, five typical papers with various different topics are included.First paper by Post et al presents Design and Construction of a Magnetic Field Simulator for CubeSat Attitude Control Testing for aerospace systems application; Second paper by Haryono et al deals with Technical Implementation of Dual Mode Fault Tolerance in Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA); The third paper by Setu and Abhishek presents Development of a Coaxial MAV with Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance Capability for application to unmanned aerial vehicles; In the fourth paper, Enjarini and Grser proposes Robust Depth-Based Planar Segmentation Algorithm Based on Gradient of Depth Feature for images processing with applications to laser scanners or cameras etc.Finally, Roy et al develops Transmitter and Receiver Design at L-band and X-band for FM-CW Radar Altimeter application.These papers cover wide topics on Instrumentation, Automation and Systems with different applications.As a new journal in the active and important field of Instrumentation, Automation and Systems, it is our hope that JIAS will add new values and new information on the state-of-the-art in the field, provide a good and unique platform to authors working in the field to publish their new, valuable, and latest developments on the above-mentioned relevant topics, and provide readers valuable information on the new results, methods, developments in the field of Instrumentation, Automation and Systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0130.007
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0120.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Instrumentation Automation and SystemsSame topicSemantic Web and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207