Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage in a child with mild hemophilia A who underwent bone marrow transplantation for thalassemia: a case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) is a relatively rare complication of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) associated with a high risk of mortality. It generally occurs in the early post-transplant phase during severe thrombocytopenia; however, since most thrombocytopenic cases do not develop DAH, cofactors are at play. Here, we discuss the case of a 4-year-old male child with mild asymptomatic hemophilia A discovered on routine evaluation pre-BMT, who developed DAH after a fully matched sibling BMT for HbE/Beta-thalassemia. The patient presented on day +21 post-BMT with sudden onset of cough followed one day later by hemoptysis. He had received FVIII supplementation with PTT normalization and FVIII levels of 28%. A chest CT scan showed interstitial lung disease with areas of ground glass bilaterally, mainly in the lower lobes. A radiological diagnosis of DAH was made, and the child was treated with additional FVIII concentrate (Advate), blow-by oxygen supplementation, red blood cells transfusion, platelet transfusion, methylprednisolone, tranexamic acid, and antioxidants (vitamin C and E). He responded well and recovered in a few days. Mild hemophilia associated with DAH post-BMT has never been reported before, however, it should be considered as a potentially treatable cause of DAH after BMT. FVIII levels should be part of the routine workup of children developing DAH post-transplantation. In the presence of thrombocytopenia, high FVIII levels of >30-40% might be required to prevent/treat DAH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".