MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414679007 · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106374

Executive functions in Palestinian Children: Effects of chronic conflict and psychosocial factors

2025· article· en· W4414679007 on OpenAlexafffund
Olivier Arvisais, Sophie McMullin, Élisabeth Bélanger, Lorie‐Marlène Brault Foisy, Amjad Joma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Child Psychology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExecutive functionsPsychosocialCognitionPsychological resilienceWisconsin Card Sorting TestPsychological interventionCard sortingMultivariate analysis of variance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Chronic conflict impacts executive functions differently by trauma type. • Gaza children show slower, careful cognitive processing under stress. • West Bank children display faster but impulsive cognitive responses. • Resilience and well-being buffer negative cognitive effects of trauma. • Context-specific interventions are vital for cognitive support in conflicts. The present study investigated core executive functions (working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility) in Palestinian boys aged 9 to 11 living in two distinct conflict-affected contexts: the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Data from 123 children enrolled in UNRWA-administered schools were analyzed to explore how ongoing exposure to conflict-related trauma affects executive functioning. The participants completed adapted cognitive tasks (Stroop, spatial n-back, Wisconsin Card Sorting Task) and self-report measures of resilience, well-being, and traumatic event exposure. Robust MANOVA indicated significant differences between groups, with Gaza children displaying slower but more accurate working memory performance and fewer reported traumatic events compared to their West Bank counterparts, who responded faster but with lower accuracy and reported higher trauma exposure. Within-group analyses revealed nuanced associations; higher resilience and well-being were linked to improved executive function outcomes, particularly in Gaza, highlighting potential protective effects. Conversely, trauma exposure exhibited context-specific cognitive correlates, suggesting differential impacts depending on trauma characteristics. The findings underscore the complexity of trauma effects on executive functions and highlight the importance of resilience and well-being as potential buffers. This study emphasizes the necessity for tailored psychosocial and educational interventions to mitigate the cognitive impacts of chronic conflict exposure in children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental Child PsychologySame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207