Association of lifestyle, dietary pattern, and liver function with cognition in older adults: findings from a cross-sectional study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Single lifestyle, dietary pattern, and liver function are closely associated with cognitive ability, yet their combined influences on cognition remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of lifestyle, dietary patterns, and liver function on cognitive impairment among older adults. Methods One thousand and ninety-six older adults were recruited from communities. Among them, 630 participants completed cognitive function tests. The lifestyle and dietary patterns of the participants were assessed using a healthy lifestyle score (HLS) and a healthy dietary score (HDS). Liver function was assessed using four predictive indicators: AST/HDL-C, ALT/HDL-C, HSI, and ZJU. Cognitive function was measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), and restricted cubic splines (RCS) were applied to explore the relationship between variables. Results A significant negative correlation was observed between HLS and liver function indicators ( r AST/HDL-C = −0.156, r ZJU = −0.270, both p < 0.001), whereas a significant positive correlation was identified between HDS and MoCA scores ( r = 0.074, p < 0.05). Poor liver function, represented by elevated plasma AST/HDL-C, was associated with increased mild cognitive impairment (MCI) risk ( OR = 1.029, p = 0.007). ROC analysis showed that plasma AST/HDL-C had the highest predictive power for MCI (AUC = 0.634). RCS analysis revealed that AST/HDL-C and ALT/HDL-C were positively correlated with the risk of MCI, with cut-off values of 14.1 and 10.1, respectively. Conclusion Impaired liver function is strongly associated with cognitive impairment, highlighting the critical role of maintaining healthy liver function in preventing MCI in the elderly. A healthy lifestyle positively correlated with both liver and cognitive functions, and a balanced diet significantly improved cognitive outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".