Relative Explanations for Contextual Problems with Endogenous Uncertainty: An Application to Competitive Facility Location
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we consider a contextual stochastic optimization problem in which unknown parameters follow distributions that depend on contextual covariates and decisions. The problem is motivated by transportation infrastructure decisions such as facility location or network design. In such high-stakes settings, decisions must often be communicated, justified, and reconsidered under alternative stakeholder requirements. To this end, we propose a framework for computing relative counterfactual explanations. These explanations identify the smallest changes in the covariates required for a solution to satisfy prescribed constraints while limiting the performance loss to a controlled level. Whereas relative explanations have been introduced in prior literature, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first work focusing on problems with binary decision variables and endogenous uncertainty. We propose a methodology that uses the Wasserstein distance as a regularization term in the objective. Beyond improving tractability, this regularization yields explanations with desirable structural properties: it produces sparser counterfactuals, induces smoother transitions in the underlying choice distributions, and keeps the counterfactual behavior close to realistic demand patterns. We illustrate the method using a choice-based competitive facility location problem and present numerical experiments that demonstrate its ability to efficiently compute sparse, plausible, and interpretable explanations. We further validate the framework on a real-world case study of electric vehicle charging station planning in Montreal, where the explanations reveal the minimal capacity investments and environmental conditions required to justify including a candidate location in the charging network.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".