MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414686822 · doi:10.4240/wjgs.v17.i9.106913

Effects of stellate ganglion block anesthesia on cognition and biomarkers in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery

2025· article· en· W4414686822 on OpenAlex
Mingmin Yang, Wei Tu, Yan Xue

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerioperativePostoperative cognitive dysfunctionHemodynamicsCognitionOxidative stressBlock (permutation group theory)Gastrointestinal function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Surgery is a common treatment for gastrointestinal tumors. General anesthesia (GA), while effective, can cause oxidative stress reactions and neuroinflammation, potentially leading to postoperative cognitive dysfunction and gastrointestinal dysfunction. The stellate ganglion block (SGB) can reduce sympathetic excitability and stress responses. This study aims to investigate whether combining SGB with GA can mitigate these adverse effects in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. AIM To analyze the effects of SGB plus GA on hemodynamic stability, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, cognitive function, and gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS Patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery between October 2022 and December 2024 were divided into two groups: A single GA group and an SGB combined with GA group (40 patients each). Hemodynamics, oxidative stress response, laboratory indices, cognitive function, and gastrointestinal function were compared preoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively between the two groups. Pain levels and complications were also recorded. RESULTS Before anesthesia induction, no significant differences were found in various indexes (including hemodynamics, oxidative stress indicators, laboratory indices, cognitive function scores, and gastrointestinal function indicators) between the two groups (P > 0.05). At tracheal intubation, 3 minutes after, and extubation, the GA-only group had significantly higher mean arterial pressure and heart rate postoperatively than preoperatively and compared to the SGB-GA combined group (P < 0.05). Twenty-four hours postoperatively, oxidative stress indicators (malondialdehyde and nitric oxide) were significantly higher and superoxide dismutase was significantly lower in the GA group than in the SGB-GA combined group (P < 0.05). Cognitive function scores [Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)] and gastrointestinal function indicators (motilin) were also significantly better in the SGB-GA combined group (P < 0.05). The 24-hour postoperative MoCA score was 0.98 points higher in the SGB-GA combined group. No significant differences were found in the time of first postoperative ambulation, catheter removal time, and 24-hour postoperative pain between groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Combining SGB with GA can maintain perioperative hemodynamic stability, reduce oxidative stress and neuroinflammatory injury, and attenuate postoperative cognitive decline and gastrointestinal dysfunction in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it