Effect of adequate glycated hemoglobin glycemic control goals on cognitive function in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This systematic review seeks to evaluate the influence of appropriate glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) glycemic control targets and their effect on cognitive function among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A thorough search was conducted across six databases, focusing on observational studies that examined glycemic control and cognitive assessment in older adults. The primary outcome measured glycemic control through levels of HbA1c. The Mini-mental state examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment served as the primary tools for evaluating cognitive function. We included two cross-sectional studies (n = 1.390) and two cohorts (n = 2.236), all rated as high-quality evidence based on the Newcastle- Ottawa scale and AXIS scales. Higher HbA1c levels in patients aged 60 and older with T2DM are correlated with lower cognitive performance, indicating that poor glycemic control may contribute to cognitive decline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".