Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 in Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study on Perceived Physical Activity Decline and Mental Health
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted the mental and physical well-being of adolescents. In particular, the literature has shown that the pandemic has had a significant impact on anxiety, depression and physical activity. The present study aims to investigate whether adolescents have changed their frequency of physical activity after the pandemic. It also examines whether these changes were in any way related to their mental health status in the post-acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, when the immediate emergency measures had subsided, but residual psychological consequences were still observable. Methods: A sample of 218 high school students (Female=130; Male= 88) from two Italian public schools completed the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), along with ad hoc questions to assess their self-perceived impact of COVID-19 on their physical activity. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationships between mental health variables and physical activity behavior. Results: Stress, anxiety and depression were significant predictors of a perceived reduction in physical activity, with depression showing the strongest influence (χ²(6) = 31.489, P< .001; χ²(6) = 32.223, P< .001; χ²(6) = 40.083, P< .001). In addition, gender differences were notable: women reported higher levels of psychological distress and a greater decrease in physical activity. The IPAQ data confirmed that most respondents experienced a decrease in physical activity after the pandemic and linked this to the psychological experiences of the pandemic. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to show how COVID-19 affects the frequency of physical activity in adolescents and how this change is related to the psychological distress they reported as a result of the pandemic. These findings highlight the need for school and community-based interventions that combine physical activity promotion with mental health support, particularly for vulnerable subgroups such as female adolescents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".