MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414704365 · doi:10.3390/healthcare13192493

A Comparison of Chinese and Korean Older Adult Immigrants’ Transnational Healthcare Practices in Toronto, Canada: A Mixed-Methods Study

2025· article· en· W4414704365 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Leah Czukar, Lu Wang, Sepali Guruge, Janet Lum, Meira Greenbaum

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Healthcare and Medical Tourism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto Metropolitan University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsImmigrationHealth careHealth professionalsMEDLINEHealthcare systemHealthcare policy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: While immigrants represent 21% of Canada's total population, they represent 30% of the country's older population. Sociocultural and economic barriers to the Canadian healthcare system have been frequently reported among older adult immigrants. These barriers are intricately linked to a vastly understudied phenomenon-transnational health practices (THP), which may involve travelling to home countries for healthcare, accessing medicine and health-related information and resources linked to home countries. This study aimed to explore the relationships among local healthcare experiences in Canada, individual characteristics and use of THP among older adult immigrants. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was used combining statistical, spatial and qualitative methods to analyze group patterns of THP and its influencing factors. Primary data was collected through surveys and focus groups of older Mainland Chinese and older South Korean immigrants residing in Toronto. They are the two largest East Asian groups in Canada, with documented transnational ties with their home country. RESULTS: The study found that THP were sought by both groups but were more prevalent among older Chinese immigrants. By integrating quantitative and qualitative analyses, the study revealed complex relationships between THP and barriers in local healthcare access relating to wait times, cost, language, availability, spatial accessibility and quality of care, for different types of care including primary, specialist, eye and dental care. CONCLUSIONS: The study generates new knowledge on THP in Canada and adds to the growing body of literature on transnational healthcare practices and behaviours among migrants across different countries and regions. It provides implications to inform health policy and deliver care for older adult immigrants as their populations continue to increase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.543
Teacher spread0.489 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcareSame topicGlobal Healthcare and Medical TourismFrench-language works237,207