MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414706239 · doi:10.5194/ejm-37-639-2025

Origin and evolution of the Variscan Léon eclogites: insights from zircon and garnet petrochronology

2025· article· en· W4414706239 on OpenAlexafffund
Lorraine Tual, Christine Authémayou, Caroline Lotout, Matthijs A. Smit, Kira Musiyachenko, Denise Bussien Grosjean, Ellen Kooijman, Emilie Bruand

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Mineralogy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsHorizon 2020Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSvenska Forskningsrådet Formas
KeywordsZirconEclogiteProtolithMetamorphic rockFelsicTerraneGeochronology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eclogites record the deep burial and exhumation of crustal terranes, which are key tectonic markers in the evolution of orogenic belts. Unraveling the evolution of eclogites and eclogite-bearing terranes may nevertheless be challenging, especially in old and poly-tectonic orogens such as the Variscan orogen, where these are scarce and potentially reworked. The eclogite-bearing Léon Domain (Armorican Massif, France) is one such occurrence. The Léon Domain is situated at the crossing of several (micro)continents and has long been recognized as a potential recorder for the assembly of this part of the Variscan orogen. The origin and metamorphic history of these eclogites remains nevertheless largely unconstrained. In this study, samples of the Léon eclogite were subjected to garnet and zircon petrochronology. In situ U-Pb ages from zircon cores constrain the protolith age at 385.7±2.9 Ma (concordia age, mean square weighted deviate (MSWD) = 8.7 and corresponding weighted mean age at 385.7±1.6 Ma, MSWD = 1.14), which is similar to zircon U-Pb ages reported from enclosing orthogneisses. Low δ 18 O values (median at 4.32 ‰) from these cores indicate interaction with surface fluids during magmatic crystallization. Garnet growth in the eclogites, as constrained by Lu-Hf geochronology, occurred at 346.5±0.8 Ma (MSWD = 0.6; Fe-Ti-rich eclogite) and 349.1±1.6 Ma (MSWD = 0.3; kyanite-bearing eclogite). Pseudosection modeling, Zr-in-rutile thermometry, and major- and trace-element maps in garnet were used to constrain the garnet growth history close to the metamorphic peak from 740 °C at 2.15 GPa to 760 °C at 2.5 GPa. Zircon separates from a cross-cutting felsic intrusion provided 321.6±2.7 Ma (MSWD = 0.76), which is taken to constrain the age of deformation and migmatization during exhumation. The new results are inconsistent with the presence of a major suture in the Léon Domain; they instead indicate that the eclogite derives from a small and short-lived back-arc basin, in which large bodies of felsic magma (enclosing orthogneiss) and smaller basaltic intrusions (the eclogite protolith) were emplaced and allowed to interact with meteoric water. The Léon Domain records rapid, cyclic inversion of this basin and thus may serve as an ancient analogue to the evolution of the Central Neotethys system, where short-lived alternating pulses of crustal extension and compression correlate with episodes of trench retreat and advance. The new tectonic interpretation for the Léon Domain supports a strong control of the slab dynamics within the frame of the protracted subduction history of the Rheic paleo-ocean.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of MineralogySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207