MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414710160 · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105542

Pembrolizumab with trastuzumab and chemotherapy for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer: health-related quality-of-life analysis from the randomized KEYNOTE-811 trial

2025· article· en· W4414710160 on OpenAlexaff
Yelena Y. Janjigian, Akihito Kawazoe, Jianming Xu, Sara Lonardi, J-P. Metges, L.S. Wyrwicz, Lin Shen, Y. Ostapenko, Mehmet Bilici, Maeve A. Lowery, Adriana Valderrama, Yunfei Guan, Ka Wan Li, Chie‐Schin Shih, Sun Young Rha

Bibliographic record

VenueESMO Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersNational Cancer InstituteAstellas PharmaSociety for Anthropological SciencesMerck Sharp and DohmeMerckMSD
KeywordsPembrolizumabTrastuzumabChemotherapyClinical trialRandomized controlled trialCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In the primary analysis of the randomized phase III KEYNOTE-811 trial (NCT03615326), pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy improved progression-free survival and overall survival versus placebo plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy in participants with previously untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 698 participants were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks, both with trastuzumab and chemotherapy. We report prespecified exploratory patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including change from baseline, time to deterioration (TTD), and overall improvement/stability rate assessed in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scales/items, EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Stomach 22 pain scale, and EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire visual analog scale. RESULTS: The PRO population comprised 685 participants. At baseline, the rates of compliance and completion for all PRO questionnaires and for both treatment groups were >92%; at week 24, the rates were >80% and >55%, respectively. No between-group differences were observed from baseline to week 24 for the QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) scale [least squares mean (LSM) difference -1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.23 to 1.91] and EQ VAS (LSM difference, -0.69; 95% CI -3.06 to 1.68). Median TTD was not reached. A similar proportion of participants in each treatment group had improved and/or stable scores in the QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL scale (pembrolizumab group 71.9%; placebo group 71.5%). Findings were similar for all other prespecified scales/items. CONCLUSIONS: While improving clinical outcomes, the addition of pembrolizumab to trastuzumab and chemotherapy did not negatively impact health-related quality of life during treatment, supporting the use of pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy for first-line treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESMO OpenSame topicGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207